Skip to main content

Introduction to Section (Meta)data, Terminologies, Provenance

The Section (Meta)data, Terminologies, Provenance (section-metadata) coordinates cross-cutting topics in metadata standards and harmonisation across all NFDI consortia. It brings together expertise from different disciplines to develop shared terminology, interoperable metadata schemas, and reusable infrastructure for FAIR research data.

Section Leadership

RoleNameInstitution
SpokespersonDr. Oliver KoeplerTIB – Leibniz Information Centre for Science and Technology University Library
Deputy SpokespersonLeyla Jael CastroDeutsche Zentralbibliothek für Medizin (ZB MED) – Informationszentrum Lebenswissenschaften

Working Groups and Task Forces

GroupContactsFocus
WG Terminology ServicesRoman Baum, Naouel KaramJoint development of terminology services, best practices, barriers reduction
WG Ontology Harmonization and MappingPhilip StrömertOntology harmonisation and mapping for FAIR data interlinking
WG Search and HarvestingBrigitte Mathiak, Heinrich WidmannSearch, discovery, and harvesting of (meta)data
WG Knowledge GraphsRenat Shigapov, Lozana Rossenova, Moritz SchubotzKnowledge graphs for FAIR data integration across domains
WG Research Software MetadataStephan Ferenz, Leyla Jael CastroComprehensive metadata vocabulary for research software
Task Force MetadataOliver Koepler, Christin Henzen, Thorsten Trippel, Heike FlieglMetadata standards and harmonisation recommendations for NFDI

Further Information

Creation of Working Group in the section Metadata

Requirements

Working groups are founded by the approval of the Section governance.

Section leadership conducts a formal review of the Charter with the following criteria to be met:

  • Completeness of the Charter
  • Motivation must derive from at least one of the Section's topic areas
  • At least 6 participants from different institutions AND at least 6 different NFDI consortia
  • Openness of the results

Elements of a Charter

  1. Motivation
  2. Objectives with concrete description of expected results
  3. Work plan with milestones (max. 24 months)
  4. Initial membership list
  5. At least 6 members from different institutions and at least 6 different NFDI consortia
  6. Members commit to provide a certain number of person months
  7. Members nominate at least 2 WG chairs (co-spokes)
  8. Adoption plan with the description how the NFDI consortia want to use the expected results concretely.